Malaysia Disneyland

Started by Kristof, May 25, 2006, 11:02:27 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Kristof

Another rumour  :lol:

Quote from: "Mickeynews.com"Could Disneyland be headed for Malaysia? If market insiders in Kuala Lumpur are to be believed, Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, now in Japan for a five-day working trip, will meet with officials from Oriental Land, the Japanese partner for Tokyo Disneyland, with the aim of bringing Disneyland to Nusajaya. Nusajaya is a large "new township development", or planned city, near the Second Link (a bridge between Malaysia and Singapore) in southern Malaysia's Johor state, just across the Johor Strait from Singapore.

Though no official statement has been issued by any of the governments or companies involved, the rumors were lent credence by the fact that officials from UEM World, the biggest landowner in Nusajaya, were said to be accompanying Abdullah. The prime minister's contingent also reportedly includes Azman

Mokhtar, the managing director of Khazanah, which is UEM World's largest shareholder.

Abdullah is said to have already met with top Disney officials early this month, when he was attending the World Congress for Information Technology 2006 in the United States. A source at a top-three regional brokerage familiar with the Disneyland-Nusajaya overture believes that Abdullah's team is in Tokyo to make a serious pitch, with sweeteners that may include offering Disney an internationally competitive package of incentives. Should the pitch be successful, any announcement of Disney making an entry into Malaysia would improve dramatically the values of land near Nusajaya.

While the Disney rumblings are still at the level of rumor, sources say the rumor has a high level of reliability and a decent chance of success. The reports raise several immediate issues.

First, it is believed that Disney will be more positive for the project going ahead if Malaysia can rope in the Japanese operator as a partner. Oriental Land has an excellent track record with the company; its first park in Urayasu, Chiba prefecture, which opened in 1983, and the later addition DisneySea are both still highly successful. By engaging Oriental Land, Disney would have a higher chance of successful execution should the project get the go-ahead. Oriental Land's involvement would also ensure proper follow-through (execution) and a strict adherence to the firm's management style and operational culture. These issues, not just financial viability, are major concerns when it comes to the track record of Malaysian government-linked companies (GLCs), particularly given Disney's strong corporate culture.

Second, the implications for the perpetual, sibling-rivalry-like competition between Singapore and Malaysia are another aspect worth exploring. Some say the Disney overtures could be a retaliatory move on Malaysia's part after the recent disastrous talks over the construction of a new bridge for the causeway between the two countries. Over the past 12 months, Singapore has hogged the limelight in terms of big tourism projects with its huge integrated resort/casino projects at two sites in Marina Bay and Sentosa Island. The winning bidders for the two integrated resorts (IRs) paid a very steep price for their winning bids, but none managed to rope in Disney as partner, reportedly because Disney did not want to tarnish its wholesome image entering a partnership with a casino project. The likely winner for Marina Bay IR is likely to be either Harrah's or MGM, while Genting should get the Sentosa IR with Universal Studios as its partner.

A comparison between the Singapore IRs and the hypothesized Nusajaya Disney park is revealing. The winning IR bidders will have to cough up S$1.2 billion (US$758 million) for the Marina Bay IR and S$605 million for the Sentosa IR for the land alone. But should Disneyland decide to go to Nusajaya, chances are the land will be almost free. Not only that, a Disney park would benefit from tourists visiting the two IRs, in effect getting a free ride on Singapore's promotional efforts. Of the two, the attrition impact would be greater on the Sentosa project, since its Universal Studios theme park would inevitably be competing with, and be compared with, Disneyland just a couple of hours away - no contest, many would say, especially considering that a Disney facility would be able to price its products and services a lot cheaper.

Third, a Nusajaya Disneyland would seem to have excellent prospects with regard to critical market mass and the availability of transportation services. Any viability study would reveal the same factors that already successfully justified the initiation of the Marina Bay and Sentosa IR projects. In addition, there are two potential international landing strips in Johor, which would boost both the hypothetical park's prospects and those of such feeder airlines as AirAsia (the Kuala Lumpur-based low-cost carrier) and Malaysian Airlines.

AirAsia is already proving to be very successful in ferrying regional travelers at very attractive rates. Imagine the ability to offer routes from Phuket, Bangkok, Hat Yai (in southern Thailand), eastern Malaysia, Hong Kong, Bali or Jakarta to Kuala Lumpur or Johor Baru (Malaysia's second-largest city, adjacent to Singapore) for less than RM200 return ($55) - which is approximately AirAsia's current pricing structure. The availability of such low-cost air services could sway Disney's decision. Malaysia's population on its own is insufficient to justify a Disneyland, but the country's low-cost air connections and the additional traffic drawn from Singapore's IRs might be enough to seal the deal. One wonders whether AirAsia founder Tony Fernandes is also part of the Badawi contingent - he should be.

Fourth, the chances of the project being realized are greater given that Disney holds strong cards in terms of negotiating with Malaysian authorities, and the company is liable to be attracted to Nusajaya since it would have a sharply reduced "cannibalizing" effect on the firm's existing parks. Nusajaya has a huge land area, big enough for five or six Disneylands with space for resorts and hotels. Given that a Disney park would be crucial in giving Nusajaya the critical mass for success, Badawi and UEM World would probably agree to most of Disney's requests - which might include free land, a waiver of the requirement for 30% bumiputra (ethnic Malay) holdings, tax incentives, and so on.

From Disney's standpoint, it is running out of room to grow after the opening of Hong Kong Disney last year. A Nusajaya Disney would be far enough away from the locations in Hong Kong, Tokyo and a proposed Shanghai park to capture the regional crowd without cannibalizing the crowds at other regional Disneylands. It would be silly for Disney not to do the project.

In all probability, Singapore has inadvertently helped Malaysia to snare Disney for Nusajaya. However, the development would benefit both countries, and should not be used to score political points on either side of the Johor Strait.

experiment627

#1
There's probably not one country left in the world (well, maybe Montenegro... but that's only been around for a week now  :wink: ) that hasn't tried to get into bed with Disney... These kind of reports pop up every couple of months (does anyone remember "Disneyland Thailand" or "Turkey Disneyland"?)...

However, it's safe to say that Disney is already looking for sites and possibilites for yet another park.

Kristof

#2
Quote from: "Mickeynews.com"Malaysia is in talks to set up a Disney theme park in southern Johor state, as it battles neighbour Singapore to be a major tourist hub.

Government officials have held talks with executives from Oriental Land Co. Ltd, a Japanese firm that operates Tokyo Disneyland, to run a similar park in Malaysia, The Edge financial weekly reported at the weekend, citing sources.

"We are exploring all options because in the southern corridor development we want it to be comprehensive, we want it to be an attractive region," Economic Planning Minister Effendi Norwawi told reporters on Tuesday.

"So it will include theme parks and other attractions, so we are hoping to get Disney, but we are discussing with several other parties to see which is the most realisable option."

"Yes, we have been in discussions with Tokyo and also with Disney in the U.S," he added, without giving further details.

Malaysia is keen to develop Johor state, which is separated by a thin strip of water from Singapore, which is itself chasing the tourist dollar by developing a casino industry.

The theme park could occupy 2,000 acres in Nusajaya, part of a 23,000 acre township being developed by state-controlled UEM World Bhd., The Edge said.

Tokyo Disneyland is one of Asia's top tourist sites and, with the adjacent DisneySea, draws 25 million visitors a year.

Kristof

#3
Quote from: "Mickeynews.com"The Walt Disney Co. said Tuesday that it has no plans to build a theme park in Malaysia, despite media reports that said the company was in talks with the Malaysian government about a park.

"We are constantly exploring opportunities around the world as we look to grow our parks and resorts business. At this time, however, there are no existing discussions in Malaysia and we currently have no plans for a Disney-branded resort development in that country," Lisa Haines, a spokeswoman for Walt Disney Parks and Resorts, told the media.

Effendi Norwawi, the minister in the Malaysian Prime Minister's Department in charge of economic affairs, earlier told the media that the government is in talks with Disneyland operators in Japan and the United States about a potential theme park in the southern state of Johor near Singapore. Norwawi also told the media that the government is hoping for a deal with Disney but is also "discussing with several other parties to get the best option."

Burbank's Disney currently has two parks in Asia, in Tokyo and Hong Kong.

experiment627

#4
He He He... I love how this story is unfolding...  8)

But, just for the fun of it, let's imagine that OLC might be looking into building another theme park resort - without disney and its brand - on this property... what would this mean for Disney's developments in Asia?

Kristof

#5
Well there were rumours not so long ago about OLC building a third gate at TDR without the Disney brand...

experiment627

#6
I remember.

Business wise, it might be a good move for OLC to be looking for new sites. TDR seems to be as big as it can get - and the numbers for both parks haven't really increased for the last five years (and my guess is that even with this "ToT in a fancy dress" and the new Monsters ride, they will not increase significantly for a long time to come...).

So to broaden its business and to actually achieve revenue growth, OLC should be looking into new areas to earn some money... and Malaysia might be it.

And of course with Disney following its own plans in Asia, OLC would probably not be able to build a Disney branded park / resort...